Theta · Vega · Delta · Gamma · Quality · Scorecard
Paste a spread row from the exported CSV. Press Enter or click Add. Each spread appears as a pill above and is highlighted in every table below.
Daily time decay accrual by underlying and expiration. Sorted by row total descending. Grand total = portfolio theta.
| Symbol | Jul 17, 26 | Jul 24, 26 | Jul 31, 26 | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FCX | 3.266 | 3.266 | ||
| MRVL | 3.242 | 3.242 | ||
| IONQ | 2.392 | 2.392 | ||
| HOOD | 2.067 | 2.067 | ||
| AAPL | 1.839 | 1.839 | ||
| DRAM | 1.762 | 1.762 | ||
| IWM | 1.243 | 1.243 | ||
| NBIS | 1.428 | -0.373 | 1.055 | |
| TOTAL | 3.266 | 3.495 | 10.104 | 16.865 |
Net directional exposure by underlying and expiration. Bull Put spreads are positive delta, Bear Call spreads are negative. Sorted most positive first.
| Symbol | Jul 17, 26 | Jul 24, 26 | Jul 31, 26 | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FCX | 25.545 | 25.545 | ||
| IONQ | 12.529 | 12.529 | ||
| DRAM | 8.488 | 8.488 | ||
| IWM | 4.275 | 4.275 | ||
| HOOD | 4.235 | 4.235 | ||
| NBIS | 2.518 | 1.163 | 3.681 | |
| MRVL | 1.814 | 1.814 | ||
| AAPL | -7.674 | -7.674 | ||
| TOTAL | 25.545 | 6.753 | 20.596 | 52.894 |
All values are negative (credit spreads are short gamma). More red = more exposure to large moves in either direction. Sorted by row total ascending (most exposed first).
| Symbol | Jul 17, 26 | Jul 24, 26 | Jul 31, 26 | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FCX | -1.431 | -1.431 | ||
| IONQ | -0.536 | -0.536 | ||
| DRAM | -0.477 | -0.477 | ||
| HOOD | -0.298 | -0.298 | ||
| IWM | -0.238 | -0.238 | ||
| MRVL | 0.000 | 0.000 | ||
| NBIS | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | |
| AAPL | 0.238 | 0.238 | ||
| TOTAL | -1.431 | -0.298 | -1.013 | -2.742 |
All values are negative (short premium = short vega). Sorted by row total ascending (most exposed first). Grand total = how much the book loses per 1% rise in IV across all positions.
| Symbol | Jul 17, 26 | Jul 24, 26 | Jul 31, 26 | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IWM | -4.125 | -4.125 | ||
| AAPL | -3.045 | -3.045 | ||
| MRVL | -1.824 | -1.824 | ||
| IONQ | -1.623 | -1.623 | ||
| FCX | -1.605 | -1.605 | ||
| NBIS | -0.797 | -0.734 | -1.531 | |
| HOOD | -1.527 | -1.527 | ||
| DRAM | -1.281 | -1.281 | ||
| TOTAL | -1.605 | -2.324 | -12.633 | -16.562 |
Daily time decay collected per unit of convexity risk. Higher = better compensated. Sorted best → worst.
| Symbol | Expiry | Position | Θ / |Γ| |
|---|---|---|---|
| AAPL | Jul 31, 26 | AAPL Jul 31st 305/310 Bear Call Spread | 7.714 |
| HOOD | Jul 24, 26 | HOOD Jul 24th 84/89 Bull Put Spread | 6.934 |
| IWM | Jul 31, 26 | IWM Jul 31st 275/280 Bull Put Spread | 5.212 |
| IONQ | Jul 31, 26 | IONQ Jul 31st 40/45 Bull Put Spread | 4.460 |
| DRAM | Jul 31, 26 | DRAM Jul 31st 52/57 Bull Put Spread | 3.695 |
| FCX | Jul 17, 26 | FCX Jul 17th 55/60 Bull Put Spread | 2.283 |
| MRVL | Jul 31, 26 | MRVL Jul 31st 195/200 Bull Put Spread | — |
| NBIS | Jul 31, 26 | NBIS Jul 31st 170/175 Bull Put Spread | — |
| NBIS | Jul 24, 26 | NBIS Jul 24th 200/205 Bull Put Spread | — |
Daily time decay collected per unit of volatility exposure. Higher = better compensated for a vol spike. Sorted best → worst.
| Symbol | Expiry | Position | Θ / |V| |
|---|---|---|---|
| FCX | Jul 17, 26 | FCX Jul 17th 55/60 Bull Put Spread | 2.034 |
| NBIS | Jul 24, 26 | NBIS Jul 24th 200/205 Bull Put Spread | 1.792 |
| MRVL | Jul 31, 26 | MRVL Jul 31st 195/200 Bull Put Spread | 1.777 |
| IONQ | Jul 31, 26 | IONQ Jul 31st 40/45 Bull Put Spread | 1.474 |
| DRAM | Jul 31, 26 | DRAM Jul 31st 52/57 Bull Put Spread | 1.375 |
| HOOD | Jul 24, 26 | HOOD Jul 24th 84/89 Bull Put Spread | 1.354 |
| AAPL | Jul 31, 26 | AAPL Jul 31st 305/310 Bear Call Spread | 0.604 |
| IWM | Jul 31, 26 | IWM Jul 31st 275/280 Bull Put Spread | 0.301 |
| NBIS | Jul 31, 26 | NBIS Jul 31st 170/175 Bull Put Spread | -0.508 |
Each column normalized independently. Grouped by expiration, sorted by Theta within each group.
| Symbol | Type | Expiry | DTE | Chance | Credit | Max Profit | Max Loss | EV | Θ Theta | Vega | Γ Gamma | IV | Θ/|Γ| | Θ/|V| | Return | Loss/Risk |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FCX | Bull Put | Jul 17, 26 | 15 | 57.4% | $80 | $80 | $420 | -$133 | 3.266 | -1.605 | -1.4305 | 57.9% | 2.28 | 2.03 | -141.9% | -27.0% |
| HOOD | Bull Put | Jul 24, 26 | 22 | 87.4% | $74 | $74 | $426 | $11 | 2.067 | -1.527 | -0.2980 | 74.2% | 6.93 | 1.35 | 35.8% | — |
| NBIS | Bull Put | Jul 24, 26 | 22 | 64.0% | $100 | $100 | $400 | -$80 | 1.428 | -0.797 | 0.0000 | 128.0% | — | 1.79 | -70.0% | -17.5% |
| MRVL | Bull Put | Jul 31, 26 | 29 | 86.4% | $72 | $72 | $428 | $4 | 3.242 | -1.824 | 0.0000 | 98.0% | — | 1.78 | -34.7% | -5.8% |
| IONQ | Bull Put | Jul 31, 26 | 29 | 72.0% | $99 | $99 | $401 | -$41 | 2.392 | -1.623 | -0.5364 | 88.7% | 4.46 | 1.47 | -36.9% | -9.1% |
| AAPL | Bear Call | Jul 31, 26 | 29 | 68.9% | $66 | $66 | $434 | -$89 | 1.839 | -3.045 | 0.2384 | 27.4% | 7.71 | 0.60 | -138.6% | -21.1% |
| DRAM | Bull Put | Jul 31, 26 | 29 | 70.4% | $76 | $76 | $424 | -$72 | 1.762 | -1.281 | -0.4768 | 101.7% | 3.69 | 1.38 | -71.7% | -12.9% |
| IWM | Bull Put | Jul 31, 26 | 29 | 85.1% | $73 | $73 | $427 | -$2 | 1.243 | -4.125 | -0.2384 | 25.1% | 5.21 | 0.30 | 29.4% | — |
| NBIS | Bull Put | Jul 31, 26 | 29 | 77.0% | $78 | $78 | $422 | -$37 | -0.373 | -0.734 | 0.0000 | 129.4% | — | -0.51 | 71.2% | — |
| TOTAL / AVG | — | 74.3% avg | $718 | $718 | $3782 | -$439 | 16.865 | -16.562 | -2.7418 | 81.2% avg | 6.15 | 10.20 | -357.4% | -7.6% | ||
(current P&L / max loss) × 100.
Highlighted in red when ≤ −25%, which is the stop-loss close-out threshold.
Unlike Return (which is % of max profit), this metric uses the same denominator as the actual risk taken.
Chance × Max Profit − (1 − Chance) × Max Loss.
Treats the trade as either expiring fully worthless (max profit) or reaching max loss — nothing in between.
Negative EV is normal and expected for credit spreads: max loss is typically 4–10× max profit,
so even an 80% winner produces a negative number. Use EV as a relative ranking across positions,
not as an absolute signal. A less-negative EV means the risk/reward ratio is better for a given probability.